Out Over Our Skis
“Science,” in America, is way, way, way out over its skis, drowning us in “revolutionary” new ideas and products that are harmful enough to kill, and have not been adequately tested. If you’re in a hurry and don’t have time to read all of this, the working title was The Power of “NO.” It is time to say an emphatic “NO!!!” to politicians who want to violate your personal rights.
This is a bit of a rant, with some things I want to get off my chest, but I think this is a topic that needs attention, and there will be some action items for your health, starting with “buy organic or just shoot yourself.” I currently have 22 articles partially written, looking for just the right way to finish them, in part due to the interlocking nature of the topics. The result being that I’m likely to repeat some items and scenarios. Hopefully that just helps get some very important points home. While covid forms some of the foundation for today’s arguments, the issue is an out-of-control “scientific” community spending trillions of your tax dollars and then forcing untested and often unsafe products on you.
“Science” has been replaced by marketing. They have a product to sell, so they paint it a pretty color and put some schmuck in a lab coat and have him tell you how good it is. Meanwhile, actual scientists are watching and mouthing “wtf?” But those actual scientists can’t get on the air, because Pfizer, Bayer, GSK, and Moderna would yank all their ads and suddenly The View, Morning Joe, 60 Minutes, Meet the Press, and a dozen more go even further down in ratings and thousands of talking heads, writers, and even low-level grunts at the various networks are on the dole, as the Brits say.
Wear a mask? Take an experimental injection, give up my gas stove or my internal combustion driven car while you eat dinner at The French Laundry (gas stoves!) then fly your private jet to Dubai to hobnob with your coconspirators? Simple answer that will never change: NO!!! You people (govt) screwed the pooch on covid, climate, and energy, and every single one of you should resign. More importantly, government bureaucrats had no authority for any of what was done. Ergo, my response, when a USFS warden threatened to arrest me for walking on a Point Reyes trail without a mask was: “NO, you don’t have that authority.” You can’t quote a criminal, vehicle, or other code violation, because such a law does not exist. No authority in the US has the power to demand that you do any of the things that you all did, because of an alleged global crisis. It was all a lie, but it could have ALL been prevented if everyone had just said NO!!!
The bigger problem is the part about it all being a lie. We have been awash in lies for quite some time, although they really went nuts during covid. And for those paying attention or having any understanding of the science, most of the lies are so blatant that they should have been laughed at. So why weren’t they? As Goebbels told us, repeat a lie long enough and people will believe that it must be true.
Before proceeding with today’s message, let me offer, especially for those new to my blog, the most important advice I was ever given, and the most important advice I can now give. From Jack LaLanne, “If it wasn’t food 200 years ago, it isn’t food today.” (Jack said 100 years, but he said it nearly 75 years ago.) Or as my friend Dr. Robert Rowen says, “If God didn’t make it, I won’t eat it.” From the impossible burger and artificial sweeteners (which includes table sugar) to GMOs, cooking oils made from seeds that would otherwise be industrial waste, the dramatic decline in American health correlates so perfectly with the surge in “science,” and the development of these nonfoods, as well as the increase from three vaccinations in 1950 to the current demand that kids get close to 100 (with the adoption of the twice a year covid jabs as part of the schedule). There are a great many things from “science” that we were better off without. When you see “science” or “scientist” in quotes, know that I’m singling out faux science and faux scientists, as well as the media hacks who echo their blather.
Between pesticides and chemical fertilizers, factory farming and CAFOs (concentrated animal feeding operations), your dinner table is now someone’s science project, and the levels of heavy metals and toxic chemicals is beyond belief, while the nutritional content sags every year. So my best advice is to eat naturally: grass-fed meats, pastured or wild fowl and eggs, wild-caught fish, raw milk or cream if you can find it, and only cooking with natural oils, EVO, ghee, coconut oil, avocado oil, and only eating locally grown fruits in season. And don’t buy any new “revolutionary” products (foods or medicines) until they’ve had at least two generations to prove themselves.
Don’t be the early adopters of new and unproven products to put into your body. Remember the Olestra fiasco? It not only removed unwanted fat from foods (based on flawed science that said fat was bad for you) but also negated the body's ability to absorb essential vitamins. Side effects included cramps, gas and loose bowels, with the unappetizing title of “anal leakage.” The NIH published papers here and here on Olestra without questioning the significance of these issues, then approved it for use, and it is still approved today, although I don’t believe any American manufacturers are using it, due to the bad publicity. There was even a study claiming Olestra could remove PCBs from your body. The Center for Science in the Public Interest finally got around to publishing their advice to “avoid” Olestra more than a decade after it was approved and years after the negative reports were published in mainstream media. The Olestra fiasco stands as proof of the power of NO! It’s now gone, but not by government action. You refused to buy it, so it disappeared. The same must now happen with all GMOs, EVs, mRNA injections, solar panels, windmills, and our open border. They simply cannot work. Just say NO!!
Understand that whether you’re a believer that GMO foods themselves are dangerous, and there have been no studies to adequately show that either way, what GMO means is that your food is undoubtedly laced with glyphosate and paraquat, because the whole purpose for GMO foods is to be able to survive glyphosate, and once we’ve crossed that bridge we add other chemicals, which then yields a better crop from the farmers’ financial point of view, but with ever-diminishing nutritional value and safety. Top of the list of sprayed crops are wheat, oats, corn, and soy, in that order. Coffee gets sprayed just as much, but only with pesticides, not herbicides. So if you’re not buying organic, you’re eating significant quantities of poisons that are banned in most other countries.
But here in America, under the reign of Big Pharma, herbicides and pesticides are big business. Somehow, despite courts awarding a sum approaching $1 Billion and counting in damages in the many glyphosate lawsuits, we’re still spraying nearly a pound of this poison for every man woman and child in America, and Mexico, of all places, won’t import our produce because of it. How have we become so controlled by Big Pharma that Mexico is now making better decisions than we are? Maybe because we allow prescription drugs to be advertised, as all other countries forbid, other than New Zealand. When Pfizer, Bayer, Monsanto, and Moderna provide more than 50% of your ad revenue, you’re not going to air stories that might harm them financially, thus risking your own revenue. Trust me, Rachel Maddow knows the jabs are useless at best and very likely dangerous, but she has to say “safe and effective,” and “your best defense,” because without Pfizer’s ad dollars, MSNBC goes down like the Titanic, which they really should, since they haven’t been a “news” organization for ages.
A recent survey of offerings from various fast-food outlets found dangerous levels of lead, mercury, glyphosate, paraquat, aluminum and various PFAS chemicals. While the list even included In ‘n’ Out Burger, the worst offender was Panera Bread! And not one of the tested outlets was deemed safe, with amounts of some dangerous toxins far exceeding the “safe” levels by as much as 6000 times the amounts allowed in drinking water. Worse news still, many school districts are contracting with these same fast-food outlets for school lunches. And when did it become the states responsibility to feed your children? If you care about your kids, pack them a healthy lunch.
A book that I wanted to write and probably won’t, due to the challenge of keeping up with the tangled web involved, was to be titled The Diogenes Project, aimed at documenting the depth and depravity of the lies flowing from our nation’s capital and the legacy media. Attempting to chronicle them all has been complicated, first by the illegal and unconstitutional actions of our DOJ in colluding with news agencies and social media platforms, and now by a new version of the same practice called “Community Notes.” What Xitter and FB are doing now is making the exact same nefarious professional “fact checkers,” who were literally, not figuratively and not virtually, but literally wrong 100% of the time, now appear as if they are anonymous, civic minded citizens providing clarification or context. Trust me, it’s the same paid and fake fact checkers now hiding behind a different curtain. I’ll admit that I have seen a few, a very precious few, examples where the “community notes,” were intelligent and appropriate, but that just serves to bolster the nefarious entries.
A recent tweet by Dr. Peter McCullough, someone I’ve cited previously as the most published pulmonologist on the planet, iow, an unassailably reliable voice and who has been a literal hero during the pandemic, was attacked, and yes that’s the correct term, by a community note. Dr. McCullough, citing numerous studies and clinical data, stated something that every researcher knows, that the covid jabs are highly associated with a clotting disorder which is often fatal. Community notes attempted to paint a different picture. Mr. or Ms. Community Notes is anonymous, but I can absolutely guarantee you that whoever it is hasn’t got the right to counter Dr Peter McCullough, anonymously or otherwise. He is Babe Ruth, and they are a pee-wee league pitcher who couldn’t get one past Dr. M given a thousand tries.
And therein lies the rub, as Shakespeare would put it. An expert in the field says something, and some jerk from behind a remote computer says he’s wrong, without providing any countering evidence or citing a single byte of data, and without providing any means of rebuttal. It’s like arguing with two-year-olds, but whoever is behind all this is actually convincing large swaths of the Meta and Xitterspheres that their anonymous “experts” are more credible than actual identifiable, credentialed doctors and scientists, who are blocked, demonetized, deplatformed and community-noted into oblivion. The search for truth and reliable scientific evidence is becoming more difficult by the day, as even the vaunted progress called “peer review” has been massively corrupted. Clinical evidence that fails to support what the powers that be want simply disappears. Papers are “retracted,” and not by their authors, but by anonymous overlords who have perverted the peer-review process, while flawed “science” is published as if it were truth.
News channels faithfully report White House talking points that inflation is down. Seriously? Every American who is not a billionaire has noticed that their regular expenses are up by anywhere from 15-25% since Joe Biden took office. These people know they are lying but their paychecks demand it. They report that each year in the past 25 has been “the hottest year on record,” when the hottest year in the last 200 was 1936. But even that is irrelevant, because climate varies on multiple cycles of solar output (approximately 20 years), ocean currents (15 years), and even the earth’s rotational association to the sun (100,000-year Milankovitch Cycle). We can observe that today’s climate appears quite similar to that of 2000 years ago.
Dr. Paul Marik, one of the most notable emergent care physicians in America, published the results of a study showing that high doses of vitamin C, along with B1 and a generic steroid showed remarkable benefits for the treatment of sepsis, a major problem in emergency medicine. In short order, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published an article citing exactly no research but calling Dr. Marik’s conclusions “ethically and morally unacceptable.” He had shown a way to reduce mortality in emergency and post-operative
settings, but it was not anything from which the pharmaceutical industry — which funds all medical schools in America, as well as JAMA — can make a profit, as it simply used vitamins and a generic drug. I personally regard JAMA’s actions in this regard to be criminal, as they have resulted in numerous preventable deaths, past, present and future.
The studies damning Ivermectin (IVM) during the pandemic are a prime example. IVM is one of the oldest drugs on the planet and has an exemplary safety record. If it did nothing at all to alleviate the virus it would, at the bare minimum, have done no harm. And yet several studies were peer reviewed and published in record time showing the opposite. Highly credible researchers, including Dr. McCullough, the eminent Dr. Pierre Kory, and others, challenged these reports and discovered they were completely fictional, down to the cohort of alleged volunteers who were found to be nonexistent, and the “research labs” conducting these studies were also found to have only existed for the purpose of writing these false reports, after which they disappeared. Yet even today, many people think IVM is a dangerous veterinary medication. While it can typically take two to three years for a study to be peer reviewed and published, these were approved — literally — in just days. And while the stench from that perversion of science was unbelievable, I’m willing to bet that this is the first you’ve heard of it. The public health authorities whose job it is to protect you, are instead protecting their own stock portfolios. Ivermectin is generic; mRNA and Remdesivir, both of which did immense harm, made Big Pharma well over $100 Billion last year alone. With that kind of ROI, who cares about a few dead peasants.
A congressional panel on the subject of covid “vaccine” injuries was recently dismissed by the mainstream media, simply because it was chaired by Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, one of the media’s favorite punching bags. But here’s the thing, the panel, consisting of actual experts, wasn’t about her, it was about all those who have been harmed by releasing a drug that wasn’t properly tested. Estimates are that between 500K and 2M Americans have been permanently harmed with 750K killed. So we shoot the messenger? According to VAERS reports presented at the meeting, 2020 had 10,596 events (reports of significant injury, disability or death associated with all vaccines) while covid-jab roll-out year 2021 had 700,194 such reports. Call me crazy but that sounds significant. And knowing that VAERS usually only receives reports on 2 to 3% of vaccine injuries (as adjudicated by numerous experts in the field and most notably Jessica Rose) what we have isn’t a flare going up, but a nuclear mushroom cloud. Yet somehow the “safe and effective” crowd bulldozed this congressional panel because they find the chairperson annoying. And the “safe and effective” lie rolls on, because that’s what they are paid to say, just as Nazi war criminals were paid for their actions.
Is that a bad or unfair metaphor? I think not. 10 million Jews and thousands of others perished at the hands of the Nazis. The worldwide death toll from the jabs, the direct death toll of strokes and heart attacks, has surpassed 2 million, with another 2 million disabled. That doesn’t count the new wave of “turbo cancers” that has sprung up, nor several hundred other causes of death that trace back to the jabs but remain unacknowledged by Pfizer’s paid media and government hacks. The Nazi holocaust ended during the summer of 1944. The mRNA nightmare will be with us for generations, as we’ve now proven that the effects are heritable… something the scientists already knew, because three decades of testing mRNA on lab animals had already demonstrated that the “side effects” were actually worse in the second and third generation. And let’s not forget that these same people (Fauci and Co.) were the ones who created this virus/bio weapon.
Steve Kirsch has offered as much as $2 million dollars to anyone on the pro-vax side of covid willing to debate the dangers of these shots, and it’s a one-way bet. He pays if he loses, they pay nothing if he wins. Fauci and the rest have pocketed millions, illegally and unethically, from Big Pharma, for years. They are technically permitted to accept royalties on products they help by funding research, but it is unquestionably illegal for them to profit from falsified studies that they helped create. Now, with their haul during the pandemic being seven figures each, they’re all riding off into the sunset with more money than they have time to spend, but if Steve Kirsch offered you two million dollars against your zero dollars, so the worst you can do is break even, and you were confident in your ability to win the debate because you had done all the homework that any of these individuals were legally and ethically required to do, what possible reason would you have to walk away from $2 mil for a few hours of work? I’ll assume you can come to the same conclusion I did.
We are following the “science,” or rather the immature and unvetted information that we are being told is science. 100% of scientists agree… as long as you censor all those who disagree. While the media parrots the lie that 97% of “scientists” agree that humans are changing the climate, a deep dive into their actual statements shows the number who believe that humans might be affecting (not driving) climate change is less than 0.7%. What the 97% actually agree on is that the climate is changing. But then it always has. And yet those of us who belong to the overwhelming majority who realize that only God can alter climate, are called “deniers.” Well, I’m a proud denier, a denier of both junk science and fake news. Besides, the earth was dramatically warmer 800 years ago, when the world population was 340 million, roughly the equivalent of the US population in 2023.
As I’ve recently published, the whole idea that gender can be changed is an absurd bald-faced lie. It simply cannot ever be accomplished. And that will still be true 1000 years from now. This entire fantasy would better have come from the pens of Ray Bradbury, Isaac Asimov, or Kurt Vonnegut. It is pure science fiction, and not even good science fiction. And yet women suing to keep men out of their sports are being vilified with the newly created non-word “cisgender.” And every day we are treated to mental defectives who rail against “misgendering.” Dude, you have a beard, an Adam’s apple and a penis. You’re misgendering yourself.
The Green Agenda, from compact fluorescent light bulbs (a serious toxic hazard filled with mercury) to MTBE, a waste product from refining motor fuel that the industry and the Sierra Club forced into gasoline, but fortunately only in California, to solar panels and windmills, is a gigantic failure, and we’re not even bothering with actual toxic emissions; we’re trying to control carbon dioxide! Following close behind or perhaps leading the pandemic response in terms of monumental failures, it has served to drastically increase the cost of energy and taxes (where do you think all the money came from to build windmills, give $10K rebates on EVs, and provide “free” solar panels to so many homes?) The cost has been massive, and the results have been such a monumental failure as to make Ford Motors feel good about the Edsel. The biggest problem being the decommissioning of other forms of electrical generation, leaving large swaths of the planet with insufficient energy, even to heat their homes.
Some years back, my community (in Concord, CA) held a meeting of the supervisors to discuss the installation of solar panels on a hill less than 500 yards from my front door which would be visible from my yard. At the meeting, I was one of several there to protest against it. I cited the evidence that solar panels are virtually a net zero, using as much energy in their creation as they will produce in their functional lifespan. I also asked the supervisors to tell us the cost of the project. The chair’s answer was, “it will cost nothing.” To which I responded that such an assertion was disingenuous at best and absurd on its face. Obviously, such a project had significant cost. The answer came back that it was funded by a federal grant, to which I responded, “Yes, OUR TAX DOLLARS!! How much are you people receiving, personally, to see this done?” I was ruled out of order and the project was built. So, it’s just awesome that Tesla owners pay the equivalent of $2.59/gal while the rest of us are paying $14.74 to cover all the costs buried in 3,000-page “green” bills. Does the equivalent of $17.33/gal sound like a win to you?
Not only do solar panels and windmills provide less power during their usable lifespan than was used to create them, in a couple of decades we will have a huge mountain of nonrenewable waste from gigantic windmill blades and the tons of concrete in which the windmills are rooted, solar panels and batteries containing both rare and toxic minerals. Someone, probably a politically connected someone, gets a wild hair over a new idea, and suddenly they want all the rest of us to subsidize it, and want our elected representatives to mandate that we all use it. Just in case you’ve forgotten where we are, such practices violate the US Constitution. The government has no standing in a free society, to demand that we use a more expensive and less reliable energy system, drive electric cars, or close our businesses because of a virus. Regardless of how wonderful, ethical, or otherwise sound these ideas might be (and the ones mentioned were not) this is still supposed to be a free country.
And yet your option to continue to drive your car, with its internal combustion engine, has already been unconstitutionally mandated away, beginning in 2035, barely a decade into the future, and without the ghost of a chance that our infrastructure or auto manufacturers can even approach that deadline. What you may not know is that EVs, every single one of them, cost considerably more to create than the selling price, up to 3X in some cases. So when your neighbor shows up with their new EV, know that we paid more (out of our taxes) than they paid to drive that car off the lot and have the extremely expensive charging station wired to their house. And also know that the current electrical grid couldn’t come close to handling the demand if we quadrupled the current fleet of EVs from 2.5% of all cars in CA (less in other states) to 10%. 100% is something we couldn’t possibly handle under any scenario, but don’t worry, because we’ll run out of rare-earth minerals to make the batteries and panels before that happens. So keep your bicycle in good repair. For all the hand wringing over the possibility that we would soon run out of oil, we’ll definitely run out of Neodymium, dysprosium, and praseodymium (at roughly two tons per windmill and 3-5 pounds in each EV) well before that. Ditto for indium, gallium, selenium, cadmium, and tellurium, needed for solar panels. It’s absolutely insane to think this is the future.
There is, in actual fact, a technology for an EV that shows great promise, but it wasn’t created by someone with friends in high places, so it isn’t being subsidized as yet. The hydrogen fuel cell car with its own generating capacity through the combustion of hydrogen gas, would give us cars we could fill up at any corner station, and which wouldn’t require hundreds of pounds of batteries. Unlike petroleum-based fuels, the only thing created by hydrogen combustion is water, and hydrogen is the most plentiful element in the universe. But like nuclear energy, we recall the disaster when the hydrogen filled Hindenburg exploded in 1936 at Lakehurst, so it’s a no on hydrogen and our best chance for non-polluting energy is shelved for God knows how many more decades. I’m not in a position to state that hydrogen fuel cells are the answer, but it certainly looks like that has potential, while creating EVs with massive batteries, which can spontaneously explode with enough power to level your house, has absolutely no chance of working. And if we weren’t subsidizing EVs, which I don’t remember voting for, they simply wouldn’t exist. Given the choice, and no government interference or subsidy, would your $90K investment in a car have you looking at a Prius, a Chevy Equinox, or an Audi S8, as driven be Jason Statham in The Transporter, or an S-Class Mercedes?
As to the corruption of science, ask Siri how many people have died from the mRNA jabs and she’ll tell you that despite what you may have heard (and mountains of reliable data) that no one has been shown to have died as a direct result of the jabs. Ask her the actual cost of building a Tesla, and you’ll get forty pages of what the cost of ownership is if you buy one, which was not the question asked. Sure, owning a Tesla is economically wonderful for you, because the rest of us are paying more, of both your electric bill and your drive-off, cost than you are. That’s not free enterprise and it sure ain’t capitalism. It also is the antithesis of sustainable.
It is critical to the survival of science that we find a way to reclaim it from the bureaucrats and charlatans. People need to know that there is no such thing as a “consensus” in science, nor is there morality. If someone tells you there is, just walk away. Science is cold and hard and doesn’t care a whit about your feelings. And if you want to know if you’re being bamboozled, look for the words, “crisis,” and “global.” NOTHING is global, and certainly no crisis is global. Global crises are a few offensively wealthy and powerful people attempting to become more so. For example, the global warming/climate change folks are looking at terrestrial measurements, which are doctored and have been slanted by the elimination of hundreds of reporting stations in the far northern latitudes, as well as the “heat-island effect” as many measuring stations that were in farmer’s fields fifty years ago are now next to a shopping mall or condo complex. The only way to measure planetary temperatures are via satellites, and those measurements do not indicate any cause for concern, nor do they support the greenhouse theories on which this whole charade is based.
More importantly, while the climate is changing, we aren’t causing it and we can’t stop it. If you doubt that, I’ve got a mountain of reference material I can share. And the US is $500 billion poorer just for the money wasted by the Obama administration’s green energy expenditures. Every single subsidized company financed by that money went bust save for Elon Musk’s Solar City, which continues to bilk the public and get subsidies. Meanwhile, John Kerry just burned more fuel to fly to Dubai and back for COP28 than I’ve burned in all the cars I’ve driven in my 57 years as a licensed driver.
I live a short distance from an enormous solar farm that stretches along more than five miles of US Hwy 95 between Searchlight and Las Vegas, and also to the massive Ivanpah solar project. All of this was built with our tax money, and yet my electric bill keeps going up. How is yours?
The problem, as I see it (and your opinions are welcomed) is that “we” are going down roads that have not been adequately mapped. We don’t know and cannot know where many of these “scientific” roads lead. An even bigger problem is the politicization of science, something that is actually not possible. It can be science, or it can be politics, it simply cannot be both. Politics is a game of ambiguity, where science is a game of precision. When literal fools like Al Gore and Greta Thunberg spout “science,” they are spouting processed bovine waste, dangerous propaganda. I’m 73 years old, and for my entire life they’ve been telling me that the end is near, that the world will end in twelve years. In terms of climate, we’re no closer, having averted the impending ice age of the 70s, but we may be a great deal closer to ending human life on planet earth through the various machinations we’re employing to save it.
Quite simply, looking at temperature trends from 1850 forward (the time when we’ve had accurate records) is like watching a newborn baby for three seconds and worrying about its development. Temperatures have been hotter and colder, CO2 concentrations have been more than 20X higher, and still, planet earth is here and doing fine, 5 billion years and counting.
We have spent trillions researching cancer, heart disease, dementia, and numerous other diseases, and our success rate is worse than the 1976 Tampa Bay Buccaneers (0-14). At least the Bucs were still alive to play the next season. In the US alone, over 1.5 million excess deaths have occurred in the nearly three years beginning in January 2021. For the first two decades of the new millennium, 2.7-2.85 million people died each year. The leading causes were heart disease and cancer, and the third was medical misadventure, where the doctor, the hospital, or the medication was the direct cause of death. Since January of 2021, that annual number has hovered between 3.3-3.5 million, and the pyramid has been inverted. Medical “error” has jumped to the top spot and cancer has vaulted over heart disease and you might want to know why, unless you’re not concerned about being one of the 1.75 million who will fall victim to one of those three in 2024. But lest you think this is a covid rant, the pandemic, and our response to it, is merely a symptom of a greater demise. While covid is a glaring example, climate, green energy, wildfires, Ukraine, Gaza, and election integrity are all part and parcel of the inmates running the asylum. They tell you 2020 was the most secure election in our history, despite all the evidence that the courts refuse to review.
The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves. ~ Julius Caesar, by Wm Shakespeare
As I’ve written previously, mRNA technology is at least twenty years from being useful, but in the minds of many independent scientists, it will never be safe, never be effective and never be useful in the foreseeable future. I count myself among those and have detailed why mRNA can no more be an effective medication (starting at ¶4) than you could flap your arms and fly. And the explanation really isn’t so complicated, if only the truth were able to survive the censors.
The “scientists” preaching about the magnificence of mRNA shots are those who work for companies like Pfizer, Moderna, and Astra Zeneca, or who work within the unbelievably corrupt federal bureaucracy, or the legacy media that draws the majority of its ad revenue from pharma. And most of those majored in law or political science and don’t know a logarithm from a log jam. As one glaring example, FOIA demands have shown that a group of fifty medical bureaucrats, from the US and Europe, corresponded amongst themselves and came to a virtual agreement that SARS-CoV-2 was a manufactured virus that could simply not possibly have emerged from nature. Specifically, the S2 spike protein, the most dangerous part of the virous had chimeric characteristics that virtually eliminated the possibility of natural origins. Those same scientists, including the current medical director of the WHO, then fabricated a consensus letter for Anthony Fauci, all agreeing that it had most probably emerged from a Chinese wet market. And of course, all of them profited massively. For those unaware, SARS originated in Ralph Baric’s lab at the University of North Carolina more than twenty-five years ago and was transferred to Wuhan specifically to avoid our FOI laws. And as the primary funding source for this illegal research, Fauci was fully aware of this. He committed several dozen federal felonies, lying about it to the US Congress, as well as violating international laws regarding biological warfare, but he has yet to be charged.
Symptomatic of the problem, Pfizer UK’s director, speaking before the EU Parliament, had the audacity to laugh out loud when asked if they had tested these shots to be certain of their efficacy. Her reply, which should make your skin crawl, was that they didn’t have time, “we had to move at the speed of science.” But what we did was rather like building the Burj Khalifa out of wood in 1700, and hoping that the building would stand, or trying to build an airplane while you’re flying it. You simply can’t bring a new drug to market in under fifteen years, at a bare minimum. And there is nothing the least bit controversial in saying that.
The speed of science is a ridiculous concept; science moves at a snail’s pace. It’s rather like the backwards colloquialism of “quantum leap,” which in science is the smallest movement possible, not a giant stride as the euphemism is currently interpreted. Just one more example of “science” when in the hands of the unqualified. The “speed of science” is best compared to the woodworker’s motto, “measure twice, cut once.”
There has been a virtual explosion of cancer, heart disease, dementia, macular degeneration, all with strong ties to nutrition, as well as autism, and various mental disorders in the last 100 years, and a decline in sperm counts of over 50% since 1980. Could there be something in the water (e.g. fluoride, glyphosate, paraquat)? Or does the problem go deeper than that. Have we simply engineered our way to a kind of Armageddon? The Malthusians at the WEF and the eugenics Klan don’t seem concerned. Either they’re happy about all this dying, or they feel like it’s not their problem, as if they’re behind it and feel like they have the antidote. I must say that much of what I see is so shockingly illogical that that last idea seems the most probable.
Fluoride in the water is another prime example. No actual trials were performed in order to “prove” that fluoride was helpful, as well as demonstrating whether it was dangerous. Subsequent studies have shown that the amount of fluoride in most municipal drinking water is sufficient to result in a significant reduction in IQ in children born to mothers drinking fluoridated water, between 5 and 8 IQ points. But no one from the FDA or EPA ever tested fluoridated water to determine if it posed a hazard. It does. If you’re not using a sophisticated filtration system, you’re drinking poison.
“Science” is so far out over its skis right now that our world is imperiled beyond your worst nightmares. “Scientists” claim they can change the climate, despite failure after failure and the waste of several trillion dollars. They claim they can change gender when that simply can’t happen. But you can triple the suicide rate by confusing young children with this nonsense. You can change the gender of a single cell via CRISPR technology, but you can’t change the gender of a living being. You see the process of splicing every gene in your body requires that we kill you first. You can implant non-working sex organs, after removing the ones provided at birth, but you can’t change the trillions of gender-specific cells within a creature’s body.
“Scientists” are spraying aluminum nanoparticles into our atmosphere in hopes of reflecting sunlight to reverse the miniscule warming that has occurred in the last 170 years, following an epoch known to climatologists as The Little Ice Age. They call it “geo engineering.” Many of you may still believe chemtrails are an urban legend, but they are very real. Contrails, from high altitude jets, dissipate in moments, chemtrails stay visible for hours. And if it’s an urban legend, why is Texas implementing legislation to stop it? Legislation that shouldn’t be necessary, because the practice of distributing untested chemicals into our atmosphere is a violation of federal and international law, yet it’s happening.
Contrail
Chemtrails
Yes, earth has warmed, but it is a regression to the mean, a return to “normal,” after a 500-year cold spell. The planet is 5 billion years old. To look at temperature trends since the Civil War and think you can see a significant problem is staggeringly ignorant. And to “blame” the so-called problem on carbon dioxide, a compound essential to life, would be suicidal, if we were actually able to control it. And aluminum is a toxin. While not as dangerous as lead or mercury, it is known to contribute to early dementia, Parkinson’s, and lower IQs in children, as well as autism. My next post will be all about this.
“Scientists” say aluminum is organic and natural, which is a lie. There was no free aluminum anywhere on earth until we figured out how to smelt it out of bauxite. The larger problem is that actual science is progressing at a logarithmic pace. The number of new discoveries and new technological breakthroughs that have occurred in the new millennium far outnumber all of those found since Moses led the Israelites out of Egypt. Things are moving so fast that we are creating multiple new disciplines within science, and none seem to be communicating with each other. And new life-altering drugs, chemicals, and ideas are being implemented with virtually no safety testing, as we did with the mRNA injections.
Eighty years ago, we discovered nuclear fission. With typical human hubris, our first use of this miraculous discovery was to essentially wipe two Japanese cities off the map. You have to know that a bunch of high-ranking military dudes watched the first nuclear detonation in the New Mexico desert and became immediately tumescent. While we subsequently found ways to use this process for electrical generation, we began building nuclear power plants long before we had ironed out all the wrinkles that led to Chernobyl and Fukushima. I’m not sure that we’ve perfected this process yet, but it is our only hope of supplying energy to a world population that has more than tripled since the end of WWII. Solar panels and windmills cannot accomplish this or even come close, and there isn’t a competent scientist on the planet who thinks that it can… but there are plenty of opportunistic bureaucrats who will tell you otherwise.
Time exposes our hubris and our ignorance. We thought we had discovered all we needed to know, until someone came up with… vaccines and miracle drugs, nuclear energy, solar energy, [rediscovered] wind energy, space travel, DNA, RNA, robotic surgery, personal computers, wireless communication, and on and on. But first we invent the technology; then we implement it; then, a decade or more in the future, we discover the downside.
In the case of nuclear energy, which is, at this point in history, the only viable hope for the future, we shelved it because we tried to use it before it was truly ready. In the case of several hundred disastrously failed drugs, we’ve done the same, pulling them off the market only after dozens or hundreds have died or been disabled. The world came together to ban biological warfare, but numerous bad actors continue to play with that fire, including our NIAID. Perhaps, in a few decades or centuries, mRNA may be workable, although I don’t believe that will happen, but in any case, it isn’t today. Most free people have come to this realization, but no one is being held accountable for all the deaths and disabilities.
From the pages of the NYT: “The evidence is now in, and it is startling. The school closures that took 50 million children out of classrooms at the start of the pandemic may prove to be the most damaging disruption in the history of American education.” Sorry NYT, there’s no “may prove” here, it was unquestionably one of the most disastrous public policies in America’s short history, along with supporting the terrorist regime in Iran and our feckless “nation building” efforts around the world, but this one did damage right here, and right in our faces. But again, who is being held accountable? The various bureaucrats and the teacher’s unions did more damage to America’s youth than the tobacco industry, the fentanyl smugglers, and the human traffickers combined. And it was done in the name of “science,” science that every single true scientist knew to be flawed. The fact that masks and “social distancing” wouldn’t work was only a mystery to those completely unfamiliar with the science of airborne pathogens. Even the WHO, prior to 2019, had a document on their website saying that such measures were useless at best and likely counterproductive.
I’ve provided some additional reading below, but we need to come to an accounting. The people who manufactured both SARS and SARS 2.0, the people stealing your hard-earned money to force you to wear a mask and close your business, the people building all these windmills and solar farms that we didn’t vote for, need to be held legally, morally, and financially responsible. Congress is feckless in its fiscal irresponsibility, with the vast majority of tax money being simply squandered on things like EVs that the public don’t want, solar panels and windmills that we would all vote against if the truth could get out there, and pharma giants like Monsanto, Bayer and Pfizer, whose products have killed millions and who have had to pay a veritable pittance in fines and compensatory damages — several billion dollars to cover several million deaths hardly qualifies as equitable — need to be prosecuted for criminal acts. These transgressions were not accidental. In closing, here’s an object lesson that has been latched onto by Big Pharma, Big Tobacco, and Big Green:
In 1971, prior to the release of the Pinto, Ford Motor Company discovered a design flaw that would cause a rupture of the fuel tank and the likelihood of fire or explosion. A meeting was held to discuss the cost of recalling the cars already in the pipeline, already built and ready to ship to the dealers as well as retooling the assembly lines. A financial decision was made, based on the cost of fixing the problem v. the likely cost of litigation, fines, and compensation to those injured or killed, and the decision, based only on dollars, was to go ahead and release the cars already built, continue building more just like them, and fix the problem later. Both the 1971 and 1972 Pintos had a strong likelihood of catching fire after a 10 mph rear-end impact, but the cost to fix the problem immediately, and not sell any of the defective cars, was determined to be massively larger than the cost of paying off the lawsuits. No one at Ford possessed enough of a conscience to point out that several thousand people were likely to die, or at least no one with decision-making authority felt it was worth the loss of their annual bonus, and despite malice aforethought, no one filed criminal charges. Big Tobacco and Big Pharma perform these same demented calculations when they know their products (cigarettes, RoundUp, paraquat, PPIs, SSRIs, mRNA injections, etc.) can do massive harm. While the RoundUp lawsuits are approaching a potential $½ trillion, Monsanto has sold this problem child to Bayer to protect themselves, and Bayer is looking to file bankruptcy of the RoundUp division in order to minimize their losses, while the product continues to be sold in America.
That’s how far out over our skis we are.
The Australian Medical Professionals Society (AMPS) recently announced “Too Many Dead 2023: An Inquiry into Australia’s Excess Mortality,” a freely downloadable book investigating the troubling excess death rates Down Under, starting in 2021. They also held a conference late last month.
A collection of over 3500 case histories and of covid jab injuries: https://react19.org/science
Investigation into 38 unreported deaths that occurred among those injected with Pfizer 162b experimental “vaccine” during the clinical trials that alleged to find the shots safe and effective. These deaths were not reported as part of the findings, an act of scientific and medical malpractice and fraud. Had these results been properly reported it is extremely unlikely that the EUA for these shots would have been issued. Forensic Analysis of the 38 Subject Deaths in the 6-Month Interim Report of the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trial